Developing Robust Machine Learning Models for Predictive Analytics in Dynamic Enterprise Environments

Hermann Hesse Jhon

Developing Robust Machine Learning Models for Predictive Analytics in Dynamic Enterprise Environments

Authors

Hermann Hesse Jhon

Applied Machine Learning Engineer, Brazil.

Keywords:

machine learning, predictive analytics, enterprise systems, model robustness, concept drift, scalability, model monitoring, adaptive learning, data pipelines, enterprise automation

Synopsis

In the rapidly evolving digital landscape, enterprises are increasingly relying on predictive analytics to inform strategic decisions and enhance operational efficiency. Machine learning (ML) models play a pivotal role in this transformation, yet their deployment in dynamic enterprise environments introduces challenges around data variability, concept drift, model reliability, and scalability. This paper presents an integrated framework for building robust ML models tailored to the complexities of enterprise systems. Emphasizing data preprocessing, adaptive model design, and continuous monitoring mechanisms, the framework seeks to ensure sustained performance amidst changing business contexts. By reviewing foundational research and proposing methodological advancements, we contribute to the advancement of predictive systems that remain resilient and accurate in production-grade, real-world environments.

References

(1) Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. Data science and its relationship to big data and data-driven decision making. Big Data (2013).

(2) Gundaboina, A. (2024). DevSecOps in Healthcare: Building Secure and Compliant Patient Engagement Applications. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning & Data Science, 2(4), 3052–3059. https://doi.org/10.51219/JAIMLD/anjan-gundaboina/62

(3) Ghosh, R., Chattopadhyay, S., & Nath, A. Machine learning for CRM: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Computer Applications (2015).

(4) Baena-García, M., del Campo-Ávila, J., Fidalgo, R., Bifet, A., Gavaldà, R., & Morales-Bueno, R. Early drift detection method. Fourth International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery from Data Streams (2006).

(5) Gundaboina, A. (2024). Automated patch management for endpoints: Ensuring compliance in healthcare and education sectors. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology Research, 5(2), 114–134. https://doi.org/10.63530/IJCSITR_2024_05_02_010

(6) Žliobaitė, I., Pechenizkiy, M., & Gama, J. An overview of concept drift applications. In Big Data Analysis: New Algorithms for a New Society. Springer (2016).

(7) Bifet, A., & Gavalda, R. Learning from time-changing data with adaptive windowing. Proceedings of the 2007 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (2007).

(8) Uppuluri, V. (2024). Real-Time Monitoring of Patient Adherence Using AI. Frontiers in Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, 3(1), 59–68.

https://doi.org/10.32996/fcsai.2024.3.1.7

(9) Sculley, D., Holt, G., Golovin, D., Davydov, E., Phillips, T., Ebner, D., Chaudhary, V., Young, M., Crespo, J.F., & Dennison, D. Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2015).

(10) Breck, E., Cai, S., Nielsen, E., Salib, M., & Sculley, D. The ML test score: A rubric for ML production readiness and technical debt reduction. IEEE Big Data (2017).

(11) Amershi, S., Begel, A., Bird, C., DeLine, R., Gall, H., Kamar, E., Nagappan, N., Nushi, B., & Zimmermann, T. Software engineering for machine learning: A case study. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (2019).

(12) Potla, R.B. (2023). Supplier Collaboration Portals for Component Manufacturers: Procure-to-Pay Automation and Working-Capital Outcomes. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (ISCSITR-IJAI), 4(1), 16–40. https://doi.org/10.63397/ISCSITR-IJAI_04_01_002

(13) Feurer, M., Klein, A., Eggensperger, K., Springenberg, J.T., Blum, M., & Hutter, F. Efficient and robust automated machine learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2015).

(14) Hutter, F., Kotthoff, L., & Vanschoren, J. Automated Machine Learning: Methods, Systems, Challenges. Springer (2019).

(15) Vallemoni, R. Canonical Payment Data Models for Merchant Acquiring: Merchants, Terminals, Transactions, Fees, and Chargebacks. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. (ISCSITR-IJCSE) 3(1), 42–66 (2022). https://doi.org/10.63397/ISCSITR-IJCSE_03_01_006

(16) Widmer, G., & Kubat, M. Learning in the presence of concept drift and hidden contexts. Machine Learning (1996).

(17) Wang, H., Fan, W., Yu, P.S., & Han, J. Mining concept-drifting data streams using ensemble classifiers. Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2003).

(18) Gama, J., Žliobaitė, I., Bifet, A., Pechenizkiy, M., & Bouchachia, A. A survey on concept drift adaptation. ACM Computing Surveys (2014).

(19) Domingos, P., & Hulten, G. Mining high-speed data streams. Proceedings of the Sixth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2000).

(20) Sato, M., Ikeda, T., & Yamamoto, M. Incremental learning of dynamic models for time-series forecasting. Neural Networks (2001).

(21) Klinkenberg, R. Learning drifting concepts: Example selection vs. example weighting. Intelligent Data Analysis (2004).